German Acts  TM-Conqueror  Contact  Imprint  Links

Attorney-at-Law Michael Horak, graduate engineer (Electrical Engineering), LL.M. (European Law)
german-domains-domainlaw-udrp-adr-licence-antitrust-advertising-law-ec-ecj-food-trademark-search 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 Overview  Practice  IP Law  Computer Law  Media Law  Advertising Law  Trademark Applications  Sample Texts  Attorneys Fees  Court Rulings

 

patents-trademarks-copyright-europe

european law firm germany lawyer attorney at law in germany with power to act in the ec european community switzerland swiss austria france benelux lawyer

ip-attorney-germany intellectual property attorney in germany and eupore ec lawyer law office ip law ip firm ip prosecution ip litigation

patent-trademark-attorney-at-law patent law trade mark law design law lawyer agent european attorney domain name law udrp copyright law adr it law german

 

 

 

>Start >Overview >Court Rulings >Copyright law
>Start

Court rulings in the area of copyright law:

 

ECJ (Grand Chamber) of 20 January 2009 C240/07 - Sony vs Falcon

The term of protection laid down by Directive 2006/116/EC is also applicable, pursuant to Article 10(2) thereof, where the subjectmatter at issue has at no time been protected in the Member State in which the protection is sought. Article 10(2) of Directive 2006/116 is to be interpreted as meaning that the terms of protection provided for by that directive apply in a situation where the work or subjectmatter at issue was, on 1 July 1995, protected as such in at least one Member State under that Member State’s national legislation on copyright and related rights and where the holder of such rights in respect of that work or subjectmatter, who is a national of a nonMember State, benefited, at that date, from the protection provided for by those national provisions.

Judgement of the German Supreme Court of 1st December 1999 - I Cr 49/97 (KG) - Marlene Dietrich

Commercial use of personality rights

Brunswick Appeal Court - value of an appeal against granting information

The value of an appeal against a demand for information which has been assessed at DM 75,000.00 (€ 37,500.00) at the first instance can be less than DM 1,500.00 (€ 750.00). The appeal is therefore dismissed because the value of an appeal depends solely on the expenses arising from disclosing information.

german-trademark-trade-mark-law-patents-utility-models-competition-solicitor-law-firm deutsch english-lawyer-attorney-iplaw-ip-lawyer-it-law-itlawyer english

ip-attorney-ip-lawyer print | trademark-law-patent-domain-design-utility-model-europe save | law-of-technics-multi-media-law-german-business-lawyer back | european-trademark-protection-german-trademarks-european-law enquiry


© 1998-2010 IP Attorney at law Michael Horak· Uhlemeyerstr. 9+11 · 30175 Hannover · Germany
Fon: +49.511.590910.20 · Fax: +49.511.590910.55 · mailto:horak@iprecht.de